Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldGrange ParkApplication
Planning Application

25/04102/HOU

9 Hartland Close London N21 2BG

HouseholderGrange Park wardLondon Luton Airport: Maximum height level: All buildings, s
Submission
27 Nov 2025
Target
10 Mar 2026
Decision
20 Feb 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
20 Feb 2026
Decided by Eric Thompson under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Two storey rear extension, first floor side extension with conversion of double garage into single garage and habitable room involving changes to front fenestration.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposal would remove the mock Tudor detailing from the principal elevation and replace it with a plain rendered finish. The mock Tudor treatment is a repeated and defining feature of the street frontage and contributes to its established character and visual cohesion. Its removal would result in a simplified and incongruous frontage that fails to respect the prevailing pattern of development, causing harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposal therefore conflicts with Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and Policy DMD 37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).

Reason 2

The proposed development would breach the 30 degree guideline when assessed from the sole first floor habitable room window of the adjoining property at No 10 Hartland Close. Given the limited separation distance of approximately 2 metres, the extension would materially reduce daylight and outlook and create an overbearing sense of enclosure. The proposal would therefore cause unacceptable harm to residential amenity, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and Policies DMD6, DMD8 and DMD11 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 20 February 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer eric.thompson@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE SIT001 Drawing PRE003 A Drawing PRP002 A Drawing PRE001 A Drawing PRP001 A Drawing PRP003 A Drawing Flood Risk Assessment Supporting Information PRE002 A Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12
D3
D4
CP30
DMD37
NPPF
DMD6
DMD8
DMD11
Parties
Applicant
Mr Eamon Campbell
Timeline
27 Nov 2025
Application submitted
13 Jan 2026
Application validated
20 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 18
Decision Notice20 Feb 2026View ↗
Officer Report20 Feb 2026View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA13 Jan 2026View ↗
PHOTOGRAPHS13 Jan 2026View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION AND EXISTING SIDE ELEV13 Jan 2026View ↗
PROPOSED AND EXISTING REAR AND SIDE13 Jan 2026View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR13 Jan 2026View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR13 Jan 2026View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROOF13 Jan 2026View ↗
PROPOSED MASSING AND PROPOSED FRONT13 Jan 2026View ↗
CIL FORM 113 Jan 2026View ↗
LOCATION PLAN AND PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN13 Jan 2026View ↗
Existing and Proposed Section30 Dec 2025View ↗
SuDS Pro Forma30 Dec 2025View ↗
Flood Risk Assessment30 Dec 2025View ↗
SITE PHOTOS27 Nov 2025View ↗
VISUALS27 Nov 2025View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN27 Nov 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/04102/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Mr Eamon Campbell
Submitted
27 Nov 2025
Decision date
20 Feb 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
12
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 4 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0