25/02959/FUL

The proposed garage, by virtue of its excessive height, overall size, roof design, form and bulk would appear visually intrusive, incongruous, overly dominant and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the immediate area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D4 and D5 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and DMD6, DMD12 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).

The proposed garage, by virtue of its excessive height, overall size, depth, form, bulk, and proximity to the flank windows of the flats at No.110 Bush Hill would give rise to an unacceptable loss of daylight and outlook and would result in an unacceptably heightened sense of enclosure as perceived from the neighbouring ground floor and first floor flats at No.110 Bush Hill. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D4 and D5 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and policies DMD6, DMD12 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 3 December 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Design and Access Statement Supporting Information 164/110 Rev P10 Drawing 164/120 Rev P10 Drawing 164/001 Rev P10 Drawing 164/115 Rev P10 Drawing 164/100 Rev P10 Drawing 164/010 Rev P10 Drawing Planning Statement Supporting Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can