Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldLower EdmontonApplication
Planning Application

25/02535/FUL

185B Town Road London N9 0HL

Full / Other PlanningLower Edmonton wardSurface Water 1 in 100 Years: Description: Idox.Spatial.Comm
Submission
23 Jul 2025
Target
26 Sep 2025
Decision
26 Sep 2025
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
26 Sep 2025
Decided by Allison Russell under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Demolition of existing warehouse and office space and creation of 6x self-contained flats and 1x ground floor commercial unit with associated cycle storage, refuse and parking.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposal, by reason of the detailed design, lack of a well designed active ground floor frontage, materiality and lack of landscaping, would constitute inappropriate vernacular architectural forms and give rise to a dominant, incongruous form of development. This would appear as unwieldy, out of proportion and discordant with the established character of the locality, harming the relationship between properties and pattern of development found locally. The proposal is therefore contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2024), Policies D1 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DMD 6, DMD 8, DMD 11, DMD 13 and DMD 37 of the Development Management Document (2014) and Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010).

Reason 2

The proposed siting of the car parking spaces to the front of the site and double crossover to the front of the site, would lead to diminished highway, pedestrian and cyclist safety. The scheme is therefore contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2024) and policies DMD 45, DMD 46 and DMD 47 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policies CP24 and CP25 of the Core Strategy (2010) and policies T2, T4, T5 and T6 of the London Plan (2021).

Reason 3

The site is located in a high probability flood risk area (Floodzone 3a). The submitted FRA does not adequately assess the flood risk posed by the development or demonstrate that the proposal will not pose a risk to life, property or increase flood risk elsewhere. The proposed scheme fails to appropriately consider and mitigate the risks of flooding from all possible sources and allow for adequate measures to make the proposed development safe over its lifetime. Therefore, the proposal is not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2024), Policies SI 12 and SI 13 of the London Plan (2021), DMD 59, DMD 60, DMD 61, DMD 62 and DMD 63 of the Development Management Document (2014) and CP21, CP28 and CP29 of the Core Strategy (2010). Dated: 26 September 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer allison.russell@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE OS Plan Drawing F707-A-100 Rev A Proposed Site Plan Drawing F707-A-101 Rev A Proposed Ground Floor Plan Drawing F707-A-102 Rev B Drawing F707-A-103 Rev B Proposed Second Floor Plan Rev B Drawing F707-A-104 Rev B Proposed Third Floor Plan Drawing F707-A-105 Rev B Proposed Roof Plan Drawing F707-A-201 Rev B Proposed West Elevation Drawing F707-A-203 Rev B Proposed East Elevation Drawing F707-A-300 Rev A Proposed Section AA Drawing F707-A-301 Rev A Proposed Section BB Drawing F707-A-302 Rev A Proposed Section CC Drawing F707-A-303 Rev A Proposed Section DD Drawing F707-A-200 Rev B Proposed South Elevation Drawing F707-A-202 Rev B Proposed North Elevation Drawing Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Strategy Supporting Information AEG4508_N9_Edmonton_01 Supporting Information Contaminated Land Statement Supporting Information Sequential Test Supporting Information Topographical Survey Supporting Information Energy Statement Supporting Information PLANNING, DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information Transport Statement Supporting Information DEMOLITION STATEMENT Supporting Information Archaeological Assessment Supporting Information SuDS Pro Forma Supporting Information Planning Fire Safety Strategy Supporting Information Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Report (PEAR) Additional Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
D1
D4
DMD6
DMD8
DMD11
DMD13
DMD37
CP30
NPPF
DMD45
DMD46
DMD47
CP24
CP25
T2
T4
T5
T6
SI12
SI13
DMD59
DMD60
DMD61
DMD62
DMD63
CP21
CP28
CP29
Parties
Applicant
Ms Ann Tang
Timeline
23 Jul 2025
Application submitted
1 Aug 2025
Application validated
26 Sep 2025
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 40
125 of 40
REPORT7 Oct 2025View ↗
Decision Notice26 Sep 2025View ↗
Planning, Design and Access1 Aug 2025View ↗
Highway Safety Impact Assessment1 Aug 2025View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data1 Aug 2025View ↗
SuDS Pro forma31 Jul 2025View ↗
The location plan23 Jul 2025View ↗
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION23 Jul 2025View ↗
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY23 Jul 2025View ↗
EXISTING SECTION23 Jul 2025View ↗
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
EXISTING ELEVATIONS23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED REAR (NORTH) ELEVATION23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED SIDE (EAST) ELEVATION23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT (SOUTH) ELEVATION23 Jul 2025View ↗
PROPOSED SIDE (WEST) ELEVATION23 Jul 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/02535/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Ms Ann Tang
Submitted
23 Jul 2025
Decision date
26 Sep 2025
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
9
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 1 wks over the 8-week target