Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldSouthburyApplication
Planning Application

25/00956/FUL

9 Fotheringham Court Fotheringham Road Enfield EN1 1PU

Full / Other PlanningSouthbury wardLondon Heathrow Airport: Maximum Height Level: All buildings
Submission
13 Mar 2025
Target
20 May 2025
Decision
23 May 2025
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
23 May 2025
Decided by Jeremiah Ayerh under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Extension of vehicular crossover and associated hardstanding.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed construction of hardstanding in connection with vehicle access, by reason of the excessive width of the proposed crossover, would result in a harmful reduction of on-street parking provision along Fotheringham Road where there is high demand for on-street parking, as well as posing a risk to the free flow of traffic flow and to road safety, detrimental to road users, pedestrians and cyclists. The proposal is considered contrary to Sections 9 and 12 and of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Policies D8, T5 and T6 of the London Plan (2023), CP24, CP25 and CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD 8, DMD 37, DMD 45, DMD 46 and DMD 47 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 23 May 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Design and Access Statement Supporting Information Location Plan Drawing DPL.03. Drawing DPL.02. Rev B Drawing Additional Information Should the applicant wish to resubmit, the Council's Crossover and Transportation teams have advised that a crossover no wider than 3.66 metres, with appropriate means of enclosure to prevent illegal use of the dropped kerb, may be considered more acceptable. APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
D8
T5
T6
CP24
CP25
CP30
DMD8
DMD37
DMD45
DMD46
DMD47
NPPF
Parties
Applicant
Mr Simon Corry
Timeline
13 Mar 2025
Application submitted
25 Mar 2025
Application validated
23 May 2025
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 8
Decision Notice23 May 2025View ↗
Report23 May 2025View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA25 Mar 2025View ↗
planning statement18 Mar 2025View ↗
The location plan13 Mar 2025View ↗
Block plan of the site13 Mar 2025View ↗
PROPOSED PLAN AND CROSS-SECTION13 Mar 2025View ↗
Design and access statement13 Mar 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/00956/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Mr Simon Corry
Submitted
13 Mar 2025
Decision date
23 May 2025
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1