25/00891/HOU

The proposed dormer and front rooflights by reason of size, siting and design would appear bulky and incongruous, and would represent an overly dominant, incongruous and visually intrusive form of roof addition, out of keeping and character with, and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the property and Meadway Conservation Area, contrary to London Plan (2021) Policies D3, D4 and HC1, Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30 and CP31, Development Management Document (2014) Policies DMD13, DMD37 and DMD44, National Planning Policy Framework (2024), as well as having regards to the Meadway Conservation Area Character Appraisal.

The single storey rear extension by reason of its size, siting, excessive depth and height would have an overbearing effect upon the adjoining property No. 6 The Ridgeway, resulting in a loss of light and outlook detrimental to the amenities of that adjoining property contrary to London Plan (2021) Policies D3, Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30, Development Management Document (2014) Polices DMD8, DMD11 and DMD37 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024). Dated: 19 May 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing 25003-001 Drawing 25003-002 Drawing 25003-010 Drawing 25003-012 Drawing Heritage Statement Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can