Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldBush Hill ParkApplication
Planning Application

24/03230/HOU

74 Firs Lane London N21 3HX

HouseholderBush Hill Park wardLondon Luton Airport: Maximum height level: All buildings, s
Submission
26 Sep 2024
Target
25 Nov 2024
Decision
20 Nov 2024
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
20 Nov 2024
Decided by Karim El-Houssami under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

First floor rear extension.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed first floor rear together with the existing rear dormer extension, by virtue of its design, size and siting, would appear excessively large, visually intrusive, incongruous, overly dominant and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the original building, the row of terrace properties, and the surrounding area of which it forms part, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3, D4, D5, D8 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 20 November 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer karim.el- houssami@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan - PP-13432938v1 Drawing Block Plan Drawing Existing and Proposed First Floor Plans - ku-firslane01 Drawing Existing and Proposed Front Elevation - ku-firslane02 Drawing Existing and Proposed Rear Elevations - ku-firslane03 Drawing Existing and Proposed Side Elevation - ku-firslane05 Drawing Existing and Proposed Sections - ku-firslane06 Drawing Existing and Proposed Roof Plans - ku-firslane04 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12
D3
D4
D5
D8
CP30
DMD6
DMD8
DMD11
DMD13
DMD37
NPPF
Parties
Applicant
Mr UYGAR PANCAR
Timeline
26 Sep 2024
Application submitted
30 Sep 2024
Application validated
20 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 12
Decision Notice20 Nov 2024View ↗
REPORT20 Nov 2024View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SECTIONS30 Sep 2024View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data26 Sep 2024View ↗
The location plan26 Sep 2024View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLANS26 Sep 2024View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONS26 Sep 2024View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED REAR ELEVATIONS26 Sep 2024View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROOF PLANS26 Sep 2024View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONS26 Sep 2024View ↗
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM26 Sep 2024View ↗
Block plan of the site26 Sep 2024View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
24/03230/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Mr UYGAR PANCAR
Submitted
26 Sep 2024
Decision date
20 Nov 2024
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
8
wks · this application
Submission → decision
Public response
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1