Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldGrange ParkApplication
Planning Application

23/03775/HOU

142 Wades Hill London N21 1EH

HouseholderGrange Park wardDevelopment Control teams: Area: NORTH Code: DCAREA_N
Submission
21 Nov 2023
Target
14 Feb 2024
Decision
12 Feb 2024
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
12 Feb 2024
Decided by Eric Thompson under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Installation of two pairs of vehicle gates across the main entrance at front, with railings at front and side to a maximum height of 2.04m at front and 1.65m at side.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed railings and automated gate by virtue of it's design, materials proposed, and height would represent a visually obtrusive and discordant form of development which would detract from the open character and setting of the street scene. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy CP30 of Enfield Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD8 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).

Reason 2

The proposed development, by virtue of the lack of visual permeability, would give rise to conditions prejudicial to the free flow and safety of vehicular traffic and pedestrians, T 4 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP 24 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD 46 and DMD 47 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and the Revised Technical Standards for Footway Crossovers (2013) Dated: 9 February 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer eric.thompson@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE J37586-PC-01 Drawing J37586-PC-03 Drawing J37586-PC-07 Drawing J37586-PC-05 Drawing J37586-PC-06 Drawing J37586-PC-02 Drawing J37586-PC-04 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
CP30
DMD8
DMD37
T4
CP24
DMD46
DMD47
Parties
Applicant
Mrs Mira Bhavin
Timeline
21 Nov 2023
Application submitted
20 Dec 2023
Application validated
12 Feb 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 14
Decision Notice12 Feb 2024View ↗
TECHNICAL SPEC21 Dec 2023View ↗
ARTICLE 12 NOTICE - NOISE ASSESSMENT21 Dec 2023View ↗
AMENDMENT : APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA4 Dec 2023View ↗
AMENDMENT : Block plan of the site4 Dec 2023View ↗
AMENDMENT : The location plan4 Dec 2023View ↗
CIL FORM 14 Dec 2023View ↗
INSIDE VIEW OF GATES4 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED RIGHT SIDE BOUNDARY WALL4 Dec 2023View ↗
EXISTING FRONT GARDEN PLAN4 Dec 2023View ↗
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION4 Dec 2023View ↗
EXISTING RIGHT SIDE BOUNDARY WALL4 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT GARDEN PLAN4 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION4 Dec 2023View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
23/03775/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Mrs Mira Bhavin
Submitted
21 Nov 2023
Decision date
12 Feb 2024
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
12
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 4 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0