Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldJubileeApplication
Planning Application

23/02478/HOU

127 St Josephs Road London N9 8NX

HouseholderJubilee wardFlood Zone 2: Description: Flood Zone 2
Submission
28 Jul 2023
Target
10 Oct 2023
Decision
6 Oct 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
6 Oct 2023
Decided by Kate Vaggers under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Construction of hard standing in connection with vehicular access.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed vehicular access would by reason of it's proximity to the existing street tree could have potential negative impact to health and viability of the existing street tree which would have a negative aesthetic impact on the character of the street scene causing visual harm, and in this respect the proposal would therefore be contrary to Core Strategy Policy CP25 and CP30 and Development Management Document Policies DMD37, DMD46 and DMD80 as well as the Council's Technical Footway Guidance 2013, and the aims of the NPPF. Dated: 6 October 2023 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location plan Drawing Block plan Drawing Existing and proposed 001 Drawing Reasonable exception statement Supporting Information Flood map for planning Supporting Information Additional Information Planning permission has been refused. However, you are advised that Cadent Gas Ltd own and operate the gas infrastructure within the area of your development. Prior to carrying out works, please register on www.linesearchbeforeudig.co.uk to submit details of the planned works for review, ensuring requirements are adhered to. Vehicle crossovers require Highway Approval which can only be granted when a crossover and parking area meets the Council's Technical Footway Guidance 2013. As set out in the crossover team’s consultation response, due to the proximity of the street tree works would not comply with the Technical Standards. APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
CP25
CP30
NPPF
Parties
Applicant
Ms Marfat Abdullahi
Timeline
28 Jul 2023
Application submitted
15 Aug 2023
Application validated
6 Oct 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 21
AMENDMENT : Proposal29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Application Form29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Application Form - Without Personal Data29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : How the fee was calculated29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : A summary of the attachments in the proposal29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Delta Summary29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Block plan of the site29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : The location plan29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed form29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Fire Statement29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Additional plans29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Additional plans29 Jul 2024View ↗
AMENDMENT : Tree survey29 Jul 2024View ↗
Officer report9 Oct 2023View ↗
Decision Notice6 Oct 2023View ↗
flood risk17 Aug 2023View ↗
Block plan of the site28 Jul 2023View ↗
PROPOSED AND EXISTING FRONT GARDEN PLAN28 Jul 2023View ↗
The location plan28 Jul 2023View ↗
Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed form28 Jul 2023View ↗
REASONABLE EXCEPTION STATEMENT28 Jul 2023View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
23/02478/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Ms Marfat Abdullahi
Submitted
28 Jul 2023
Decision date
6 Oct 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0