Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldBush Hill ParkApplication
Planning Application

22/03571/FUL

22 Firs Lane London N21 3ES

Full / Other PlanningBush Hill Park wardFlood Defence 100 year- 1000m: Name: Wood Green Model Descri
Submission
19 Oct 2022
Target
27 Jan 2023
Decision
5 May 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
5 May 2023
Decided by Josephine Dutton under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Sub-division of site and erection of an end-of-terraced 2-storey dwelling house involving associated parking together with single storey rear extension and extension to roof to form gable end to existing property.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The applicant is advised to regularise the unauthorised use of the host property as two self- contained flats, by submitting an application for a Certificate of Lawfulness for Existing Development/Use. The applicant should provide evidence to demonstrate that the property has been in use as two flats for more than four years. Alternatively, a retrospective full planning application may also be submitted.

Reason 2

The applicant should note that the unauthorised flat conversion of the host property has been referred to the Council's Planning Enforcement Team for further investigation and any necessary action.

Reason 3

Statement under Article 35(2) of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedures) (England) Order 2015 This decision has been taken in accordance with paragraphs 39-42 of The National Planning Policy Framework. The application was not in accordance with the advice given at the pre-application stage. APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 42
NPPF
Parties
Applicant
Mr Hamid Reza Esfandiarinezhad
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Timeline
19 Oct 2022
Application submitted
2 Dec 2022
Application validated
5 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 18
Decision Notice5 May 2023View ↗
SuDS3 May 2023View ↗
SUDS PRO-FORMA8 Dec 2022View ↗
SUDS REPORT- PART 28 Dec 2022View ↗
SUDS REPORT -PART 18 Dec 2022View ↗
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS23 Nov 2022View ↗
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS23 Nov 2022View ↗
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN23 Nov 2022View ↗
SITE LOCATION PLAN AND EXISTING BLOCK PLAN23 Nov 2022View ↗
CIL FORM 123 Nov 2022View ↗
AMENDMENTAPPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA16 Nov 2022View ↗
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS16 Nov 2022View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SECTIONS16 Nov 2022View ↗
AMENDMENTDESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT16 Nov 2022View ↗
AMENDMENTPHOTOGRAPHS AND PHOTOMONTAGES16 Nov 2022View ↗
AMENDMENTPHOTOGRAPHS AND PHOTOMONTAGES16 Nov 2022View ↗
AMENDMENTPHOTOGRAPHS AND PHOTOMONTAGES16 Nov 2022View ↗
AMENDMENTPHOTOGRAPHS AND PHOTOMONTAGES16 Nov 2022View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
22/03571/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Mr Hamid Reza Esfandiarinezhad
Submitted
19 Oct 2022
Decision date
5 May 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
28
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 20 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0