21/04817/FUL

The proposed development, by reason of its bulk, height and scale would disrupt the street scene and create an overly dominant form of development that. Having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance, fails to satisfactorily integrate with its surroundings negatively impacting on the enjoyment, function and safety of surrounding spaces, detrimental to and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the surrounding area which would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering new residential accommodation. The proposal is therefore contrary to the design objectives as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 (in particular Section 12); Polices D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021); Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010); Policies DMD 8 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).

The proposed development, by reason existing low on-street parking availability, would provide inadequate additional capacity to serve overspill parking need from the on-site parking demand, and would increase existing on-street parking pressures, reducing available spaces used by vehicles to give way, and negatively impacting on the free flow and safety of traffic in the surrounding roads. As such and having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance, it is considered that the harm to the surrounding highway network in terms of the safety of highway users would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering new residential accommodation the development is contrary to Policy T6 and T6.1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP24 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and Policies DMD 45 and DMD 47 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).

The proposed development, by reason of the substandard internal floorspace layout, high quantum of single aspect units and substandard provision of communal open space, results in a compromised and poor level of habitable accommodation for future occupiers. Having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance, fails to satisfactorily meet high quality accommodation and would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering new residential accommodation. The proposal is therefore considered contrary to Policy D6 of the London plan (2021), Policy CP4 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), Policy DMD 8 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and London plan Housing SPG (2016).

The proposed development by reason of the failure to provide any affordable housing units and submission of inadequate viability information to satisfactorily demonstrate the proposal could not provide or support affordable housing on the site. As such the development is contrary to National Planning Policy Framework (Section 5), Policies H4, H5 and H6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP3 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), Policy DMD1 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), the Enfield S106 Supplementary Planning Document 2016 and London Plan Homes for London (SPD 2017).

The submitted sustainable drainage strategy has failed to provide adequate and satisfactory information to meet Greenfield Runoff rates for 1 in 100 year (plus climate change) events and utilise Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) in accordance to the London Plan Drainage Hierarchy and the principles of a SuDS Management. Having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance, fails to satisfactorily meet high quality accommodation and would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering new residential accommodation The proposal fails to accord with Policies SI 12 and SI13 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP21 and CP28 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and Policy DMD61 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 9 June 2022 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer james.clark@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 0528 3 F 0 100 rev0 Drawing 0528 3 F 0 101 rev0 Drawing 0528 3 F 0 200 rev0 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 099 rev3 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 100 rev6 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 101 rev4 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 102 rev4 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 103 rev4 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 104 rev2 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 105 rev1 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 200 rev2 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 201 rev2 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 203 rev1 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 204 rev1 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 300 rev1 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 301 rev1 Drawing 0528 3 D 0 302 rev1 Drawing Urban greening - 0528 3 SK 0 100 rev1 Supporting Information Daylight and sunlight assessment report (prepared by T16 Supporting Information design Ltd, dated May 2021) a surface Water Management Strategy (Dated May 2011, Supporting Information prepared by reports4Planning) Transport Assessment (Prepared by TPP, Dated Supporting Information December 2021 Ref 31246/D06), Preliminary Ecology Supporting Information Energy Assessment (Prepared by T16 Design Ltd) Supporting Information dated May 2021) preliminary contamination Risk Assessment (Ref Supporting Information 21CLR5200CW, dated 4th June 2021) Viability assessment (Prepared by Savills) Supporting Information Tree Survey Supporting Information Health Assessment Supporting Information Location Plan Drawing Planning Statement Supporting Information Additional Information Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority