Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldCockfostersApplication
Planning Application

21/02900/FUL

217 Bramley Road London N14 4XA

Full / Other PlanningCockfosters wardDevelopment Control teams: Area: SOUTH Code: DCAREA_S
Submission
26 Jul 2021
Target
18 Oct 2021
Decision
18 Jan 2022
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
18 Jan 2022
Decided by Jonathan Ashworth under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Change of use from estate agent (A2) to cafe (A3) involving two storey rear extension with basement level to allow for a B1/C3 live/work unit and installation of extractor flue (RETROSPECTIVE).

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The development, by reason of its incongruous design, height, size and siting of the unauthorised two-storey rear extension significantly increases the prominence, scale and bulk of the application building. The scheme is out of character and dominant within the street scene and results in harm to the character and appearance of the building and surrounding area, contrary to the NPPF (2019), London plan policies D1 and D4, Enfield Core Strategy policy CP30 and Enfield Development Management Document policies DMD8, DMD11 and DMD37.

Reason 2

The development, by reason of its incongruous design, height, size and proximity of the unauthorised two-storey rear extension to the adjoining neighbours would be a dominant form of development that would fail to have appropriate regard to its surroundings, create a sense of enclosure and adversely affect the light and outlook to the residents of the neighbouring properties. The development results in significant harm to neighbouring residential amenity, contrary to Policies DMD8, DMD11 and DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policy CP2 and Policy CP4 of the Core Strategy 2010-2025 (2010) and the NPPF.

Reason 3

In the absence of any detailed information, the scheme has failed to demonstrate that there would be no harmful impacts upon surrounding residential properties in relation to noise associated with the retrospective use. The proposal is therefore contrary to the advice contained within the NPPF, London plan policy D14, Enfield Core Strategy policy CP32 and Enfield Development Management Document policies DMD29, DMD32, DMD37, DMD64, DMD65 and DMD68. Dated: 18 January 2022 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer jonathan.ashworth@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing JUN21_217BR_01A Drawing JUN21_217BR_01B Drawing JUN21_217BR_02A Drawing JUN21_217BR_02B Drawing JUN21_217BR_02C Drawing Additional Information Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority

Policies cited
NPPF
DMD8
DMD11
DMD37
CP4
Parties
Applicant
Mr Mihai Ghertan
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Timeline
26 Jul 2021
Application submitted
23 Aug 2021
Application validated
18 Jan 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 17
DELEGATED REPORT8 Feb 2022View ↗
Decision Notice18 Jan 2022View ↗
Proposed section25 Aug 2021View ↗
Proposed plans25 Aug 2021View ↗
Pre-existing first floor plan25 Aug 2021View ↗
Pre-existing and existing elevations25 Aug 2021View ↗
Extract system25 Aug 2021View ↗
Parking survey25 Aug 2021View ↗
Design and access25 Aug 2021View ↗
PRODUCT SPECIFICATION26 Jul 2021View ↗
EXTRACTOR SYSTEM DETAILS26 Jul 2021View ↗
EXTRACTOR DETAILS26 Jul 2021View ↗
EXTRACTOR DETAILS 226 Jul 2021View ↗
The location plan26 Jul 2021View ↗
PRE-EXISTING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS26 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING ELEVATIONS26 Jul 2021View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data26 Jul 2021View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
21/02900/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Mr Mihai Ghertan
Submitted
26 Jul 2021
Decision date
18 Jan 2022
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
25
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 17 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0