Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldCockfostersApplication
Planning Application

21/02850/HOU

102 Linden Way London N14 4NH

HouseholderCockfosters wardEnvironment Agency - ex HMIP: Code: EAHMIP6
Submission
22 Jul 2021
Target
16 Sep 2021
Decision
28 Jul 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
28 Jul 2023
Decided by Monika Vistartaite under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Single storey front and side extension.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has not been submitted to demonstrate that the proposal would not result in an increase in flood risk on or off the site within an area identified at risk of surface water flooding, consequently this does not provide a suitable basis for assessment to be made of the flood risks arising from the proposed development. The proposal would be contrary to the advice contained within the NPPF (2021), London Policies SI12 and SI13, Policy CP28 of the Core Strategy and Policies DMD 59, 60, 61 and 62 of the Development Management Document.

Reason 2

The proposal has failed to demonstrate measures to promote and manage sustainable drainage across the site which inhibits the ability of the Local Planning Authority to fully assess whether the proposed development would result in an increase in flood risk on or off the site. The proposal is therefore contrary to the NPPF, London Plan policies SI12 and SI13, Enfield Core Strategy Policies CP21 and CP28 and Enfield Development Management Document Policies DMD59, DMD60, DMD61 and DMD62. Dated: 28 July 2023 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer monika.vistartaite@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Site Location Plan 296_00 Drawing Existing Floor Plans 296_01 Drawing Existing Elevations Drawing Proposed Site Plan Drawing Proposed Elevations Drawing Proposed Floor Plan Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
CP28
DMD59
Development Management Document 60
Development Management Document 61
Development Management Document 62
NPPF
CP21
Parties
Applicant
Mr & Mrs Chishick
Timeline
22 Jul 2021
Application submitted
28 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 8
Decision Notice28 Jul 2023View ↗
revised block plan6 Mar 2023View ↗
revised floor plan6 Mar 2023View ↗
revised elevations6 Mar 2023View ↗
The location plan22 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS22 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING ELEVATIONS22 Jul 2021View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data22 Jul 2021View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
21/02850/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Mr & Mrs Chishick
Submitted
22 Jul 2021
Decision date
28 Jul 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
105
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 97 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0