Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldBush Hill ParkApplication
Planning Application

20/01895/FUL

Bush Hill Park Bowls Tennis And Social Club Abbey Road Enfield EN1 2QP

Full / Other PlanningBush Hill Park wardConservation Area: Conservation Area: BUSH HILL PARK
Submission
22 Jun 2020
Target
15 Oct 2020
Decision
12 Aug 2021
Outcome
Refused
Committee decisionRefused
12 Aug 2021
Determined by the planning committee
Loading map…
Scheme description

Redevelopment of the site including removal of existing tennis courts, sub-division of site and erection of two new buildings comprising of 4 self contained flats in each building, together with parking, refuse storage and associated works.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development, due to the loss of sports pitches without clarity on the purpose for which funds would be obtained to support the improvements to all remaining eight pitches on the site would fail to provide a good quality supply of sports and recreational facilities and fail to facilitate health, wellbeing and social cohesion. This would fail to accord with the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Policy S5 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP34 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policy DMD74 of the Development Management Document (2014) and the Enfield Playing Pitch Strategy (April 2018 - March 2023).

Reason 2

The proposed development, by virtue of its scale and massing through the provision of accommodation over three floors would result in a scale and form of development that is incongruous and detrimental to the character and appearance of the Bush Hill Park Conservation Area. This would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Policies D4 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD37 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014) and the Bush Hill Park Conservation Area Character Appraisal (2015). Dated: 12 August 2021 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer alex.johnson@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing Proposed Site Plan PL 001 E Drawing Existing and Proposed Street Elevations PL 006 F Drawing Proposed Elevations PL 007 E Drawing Proposed Ground Floor Plan PL 002 C Drawing Proposed First Floor Plan PL 003 D Drawing Proposed Second Floor Plan PL 004 D Drawing Proposed Roof Plan PL 005 D Drawing Proposed Side Elevations PL 008 D Drawing Proposed Sections PL 009 B Drawing Proposed Vehicle Crossover PL 010 Drawing Planning Statement Supporting Information Heritage Statement Supporting Information Parking Survey November 2020 Supporting Information Additional Information Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority

Policies cited
S5
CP34
DMD74
NPPF
D4
HC1
CP30
DMD37
DMD44
Parties
Applicant
Mr Davidian
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Timeline
22 Jun 2020
Application submitted
20 Aug 2020
Application validated
12 Aug 2021
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 15
PLANS5 Oct 2021View ↗
PLANS5 Oct 2021View ↗
REPORT5 Oct 2021View ↗
Decision Notice12 Aug 2021View ↗
Parking Survey11 Feb 2021View ↗
Archaeological Assessment11 Feb 2021View ↗
Pre-Application Response28 Sep 2020View ↗
Press Notice2 Sep 2020View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data26 Aug 2020View ↗
OS Extract22 Jul 2020View ↗
Planning Statement22 Jul 2020View ↗
Heritage Statement22 Jul 2020View ↗
aerial view22 Jul 2020View ↗
completed form22 Jul 2020View ↗
The location plan22 Jun 2020View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
20/01895/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Mr Davidian
Submitted
22 Jun 2020
Decision date
12 Aug 2021
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Committee
How long, really
59
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 51 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2