Development Intent
AtlasEalingOfficersPeter Munnelly
Case officer · Ealing Planning

Peter Munnelly.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Ealing with an approval rate of 83% across 29 decided planning applications, spanning 16 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer29 decisions83% approvalSave
Ealing · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
29
Applications
2023–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate83% · 18th of 44
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Peter Munnelly's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Peter Munnelly decided — 6 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D3London Plan
5 times cited
NPPFNPPF
4 times cited
D6London Plan
4 times cited
1.1Ealing plan
3 times cited
1.2Ealing plan
3 times cited
D4London Plan
3 times cited
T5London Plan
3 times cited
SI2London Plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
260494FUL
Full Application
Other
2026-05-22
260671FUL
Full Application
Refused
2026-05-05
260494FUL
Full Application
Other
2026-05-22
260671FUL
Full Application
Refused
2026-05-05
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 29 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Savills
2. ROK Planning
3. Red and White
4. Alice Poole Architects
At a glance
OfficerPeter Munnelly
BoroughEaling
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications29 (2023–26)
Approval rate83%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Ealing planning register and published decision notices, 2023–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Ealing decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.