Development Intent
Planning AtlasEalingEast ActonApplication
Planning Application

231429FUL

12A Emanuel Avenue Acton Ealing W3 6JH

Full / Other PlanningEast Acton wardCrossrail 106 Legal Agreements: Description: Application wit
Submission
12 Apr 2023
Target
6 Jun 2023
Decision
6 Jun 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
6 Jun 2023
Decided by John Robertson under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Construction of a 3 storey frontage building with basement level and habitable loft space to accommodate 2 self contained units; construction of single storey, with basement level, rear outbuilding to accommodate 2 self-contained residential units; (Following the demolition of the existing single storey car repair garage) (Total of 4 new self-contained residential units)

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development due to its scale, siting, massing and design would represent an incongruous form of overdevelopment that is considered harmful to the streetscene and out of keeping with the established pattern of development of the area contrary to policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management DPD, and Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Reason 2

The proposed development due to its siting, proportions and closeness to neighbouring properties would have a harmful effect on the residential amenity presently enjoyed by adjoining occupiers by reason of loss of light and an overbearing effect and overlooking of adjoining properties. As such the proposal is considered to be contrary to section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework, policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, policies 1.1 (g) (h), 1.2 (h) and 4.1 (d) of the adopted Ealing's Development (Core) Strategy (2012) and policies ELV 7.4 and 7.B of the Ealing Development Management Plan Document (2013).

Reason 3

The proposed development would provide inadequate private amenity space for the proposed dwellings resulting in unacceptable living conditions for prospective occupiers contrary to Policy 7D of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan 2013 and Policy D6 of the London Plan.

Reason 4

One of the proposed dwellings would fall below the minimum size standard specified by the London Plan and the DCLG Technical housing standards - nationally described space standard (2015) resulting in unacceptable living conditions for prospective occupiers contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan.

Policies cited
D3
National Planning Policy Framework 12
NPPF
D6
Parties
Applicant
Mr James Cheung
Timeline
12 Apr 2023
Application submitted
6 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 31
125 of 31
OFFICERS REPORT6 Jun 2023View ↗
DECISION NOTICE6 Jun 2023View ↗
NEIGHBOUR SITE NOTICE17 Apr 2023View ↗
SITE NOTICE MAP17 Apr 2023View ↗
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED12 Apr 2023View ↗
DESIGN ACCESS STATEMENT_REV02_PART112 Apr 2023View ↗
DESIGN ACCESS STATEMENT_REV02_PART212 Apr 2023View ↗
DESIGN ACCESS STATEMENT_REV02_PART312 Apr 2023View ↗
DESIGN ACCESS STATEMENT_REV02_PART412 Apr 2023View ↗
DESIGN ACCESS STATEMENT_REV02_PART512 Apr 2023View ↗
DESIGN ACCESS STATEMENT_REV02_PART612 Apr 2023View ↗
SITE LOCATION PLAN12 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN_REV0012 Apr 2023View ↗
EXISTING GROUND12 Apr 2023View ↗
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION12 Apr 2023View ↗
EXISTING WEST EAST AND SOUTH ELEVATION12 Apr 2023View ↗
ELEVATION (SIDE) - EXISTING_INCLUDED_IN_ELEVATION (REAR) - E12 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR_REV0312 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR_REV0212 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR DRAWING_REV0212 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DRAWING_REV0112 Apr 2023View ↗
THIRD FLOOR DRAWING_REV0112 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED ROOF_REV0012 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION_REV0112 Apr 2023View ↗
PROPOSED EAST AND WEST ELEVATION_REV0112 Apr 2023View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Ealing planning register.
Summary
Reference
231429FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Mr James Cheung
Submitted
12 Apr 2023
Decision date
6 Jun 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
8
wks · this application
Submission → decision
Public response
Objections
54
In support
0
Total comments
54