Development Intent
AtlasCroydonPolicySP7
Planning AtlasCroydonSP7
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Croydon · Local Plan · Policy

SP7 — Green Grid.

How Croydon actually applies SP7: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

SP7 is a published Croydon planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Croydon Local Plan (adopted)

Croydon · SP7
Where SP7 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~6
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
33
times cited
in parsed decision notices
82%
appeal survival
23 dismissed · 5 allowed at appeal
18 of 67
officer reach
27% of officers recorded in this period
Sanderstead
top hotspot ward
6 citations
What this policy is about

Policy SP7 requires the protection and enhancement of Metropolitan Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land, and Local Green Spaces, including specific areas in Croydon, to preserve biodiversity.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Green Grid

Metropolitan Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land and Local Green Spaces Important Green Spaces Protecting and enhancing our Biodiversity Norbury273 Purley Sanderstead286 Selsdon291 Shirley295 South Croydon South Norwood and Woodside

Verbatim from the adopted Croydon plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
30% in approvals · 70% in refusals
33 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Sanderstead6
Purley And Woodcote4
Selsdon And Addington Village4
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue SP7 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

SP7 appears most often in Sanderstead, Purley And Woodcote, Selsdon And Addington Village. It appears across 18 of 67 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
30%
in approvals
10 citations
70%
in refusals
23 citations

This shows the decision reports in which SP7 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why SP7 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
82% survival
23 dismissed · 5 allowed28 PINS appeal decisions cite SP7

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite SP7. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing SP7 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Croydon
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Croydon's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Croydon decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.