Development Intent
AtlasCroydonPolicyDM28
Planning AtlasCroydonDM28
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Croydon · Local Plan · Policy

DM28 — Trees.

How Croydon actually applies DM28: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM28 is a published Croydon planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Croydon Local Plan (adopted)

Croydon · DM28
Where DM28 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~25
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
120
times cited
in parsed decision notices
90%
appeal survival
66 dismissed · 7 allowed at appeal
39 of 67
officer reach
58% of officers recorded in this period
Purley And Woodcote
top hotspot ward
25 citations
What this policy is about

Policy DM28: The Council will protect and enhance the borough's woodlands, trees and hedgerows by ensuring development proposals follow BS5837 2012 or equivalent, and permitting developments that don't result in avoidable tree loss or excessive pruning. This applies to all development proposals. The Council will resist developments that cause avoidable tree loss or excessive pruning, but may support developments that replace removed trees with new ones that meet policy DM10.8 requirements.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Trees

The Council will seek to protect and enhance the borough’s woodlands, trees and hedgerows by: a. Ensuring that all development proposals accord with the recommendations of BS5837 2012 (Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction) or equivalent; b. Permitting developments that do not result in the avoidable loss, future avoidable loss or the excessive pruning of preserved trees or retained trees where they make a contribution to the character and local environment of the area; c. Clause deleted; d. Permitting developments that do not result in the avoidable loss or deterioration of irreplaceable habitats, including ancient woodland, hedgerows and veteran trees. Where development is close to ancient woodland, hedgerows or veteran trees, an appropriate woodland buffer or root protection areas for individual trees, will be specified; and e. Producing a tree strategy outlining how the local authority will manage its tree stock and influence the management of those trees subject to a Tree Preservation Order. Croydon Local Plan 2024 A Place with a Sustainable Future: Green Grid How the policy works Key supporting documents 9.38 The London Plan favours the Right Place Right Tree approach. Available space, the relationship to buildings and ultimate mature tree size will be taken into account by the Council when designing/accepting layouts to avoid causing future relationship issues. The presumption should be in favour of larger trees. • BS5837 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction (2012) or any successor British Standard 9.39 Examples of types of development that could result in the future loss or excessive pruning of preserved trees or trees that make a contribution to the character of an area include new buildings in close proximity to the tree; or new roads within or accessing a development that pass within close proximity to a tree. Mature trees that contribute to local ecology and environment should be protected and any impact on such trees should be avoided or mitigated. 9.40 In all cases where the proposed development could result in the future loss or excessive pruning of preserved trees or trees that make a contribution to the character of an area, an application will need to be accompanied by sufficient information in accordance with BS5837 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction (2012), or any successor British Standard to determine the future impact upon the trees. 9.41 The loss of preserved trees that make a contribution to the character of the area is occasionally unavoidable. In these instances the council will be guided by BS5837: Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction, Recommendations, 2012 when determining which trees can be removed, although, it is accepted that trees are only one consideration when addressing the competing needs of development. In such cases where trees are to be removed, the Council may impose a condition to require its replacement either, if practical and acceptable on site, and if not possible nor acceptable on site, in another location where it might contribute to the amenity and biodiversity of the local area. When replacing tree proposals should meet the requirements of policy DM10.8.

Verbatim from the adopted Croydon plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
13% in approvals · 87% in refusals
120 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Purley And Woodcote25
Kenley15
Sanderstead9
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM28 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM28 appears most often in Purley And Woodcote, Kenley, Sanderstead. It appears across 39 of 67 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
13%
in approvals
16 citations
87%
in refusals
104 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM28 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM28 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
90% survival
66 dismissed · 7 allowed · 1 split74 PINS appeal decisions cite DM28

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM28. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM28 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Croydon
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Croydon's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Croydon decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.