Development Intent
AtlasCroydonPolicyDM27
Planning AtlasCroydonDM27
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Croydon · Local Plan · Policy

DM27 — Protecting and enhancing our biodiversity and Urban Greening.

How Croydon actually applies DM27: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM27 is a published Croydon planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Croydon Local Plan (adopted)

Croydon · DM27
Where DM27 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~8
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
62
times cited
in parsed decision notices
92%
appeal survival
54 dismissed · 5 allowed at appeal
24 of 67
officer reach
36% of officers recorded in this period
Purley And Woodcote
top hotspot ward
8 citations
What this policy is about

Development proposals must achieve a mandatory biodiversity net gain, maintain or establish semi-natural vegetation, and incorporate urban greening measures such as green roofs or walls. This applies to all development sites in the borough. The council will resist development proposals that do not meet these requirements.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Protecting and enhancing our biodiversity and Urban Greening

Table 9.1D Urban Greening Factor DM27.1 To enhance biodiversity across the borough and improve access to nature, development proposals should: Greening Type Value a. Achieve mandatory biodiversity net gain on all development sites proportionate to the scale, to enhance local flora and fauna and aid pollination locally; Semi-natural vegetation (e.g. trees, woodland, species-rich grassland) maintained or established on site. b. Incorporate urban greening and biodiversity measures around, within the grounds and on the buildings in the form of green roofs, green walls or equivalent measures; Wetland or open water (semi-natural; not chlorinated) maintained or established on site. Intensive green roof or vegetation over structure. Substrate minimum settled depth of 150mm – see livingroofs.org for descriptions.

Verbatim from the adopted Croydon plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
21% in approvals · 79% in refusals
62 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Purley And Woodcote8
Kenley8
Sanderstead7
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM27 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM27 appears most often in Purley And Woodcote, Kenley, Sanderstead. It appears across 24 of 67 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
21%
in approvals
13 citations
79%
in refusals
49 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM27 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM27 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
92% survival
54 dismissed · 5 allowed · 1 split60 PINS appeal decisions cite DM27

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM27. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM27 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Croydon
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Croydon's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Croydon decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.