Development Intent
AtlasCroydonOfficersGeorgina Betts
Planning Atlas›Croydon›Georgina Betts
Case officer · Croydon Planning

Georgina Betts.

Active — last recorded decision Mar 2026

A case officer at Croydon with an approval rate of 61% across 105 decided planning applications, spanning 22 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer105 decisions61% approvalSave
Croydon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
105
Applications
2021–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%33%202136%202264%202367%202474%202580%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate61% · 60th of 83
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Georgina Betts's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Georgina Betts decided — 18 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D3London Plan
5 times cited
D12London Plan
5 times cited
SP4Urban Design, Heritage and Local CharacterCroydon plan
4 times cited
DM10Design and characterCroydon plan
4 times cited
D4London Plan
3 times cited
NPPFNPPF
3 times cited
DM10.6Croydon plan
2 times cited
DM13Refuse and recyclingCroydon plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
11
55%
9
56%
8
63%
6
100%
6
0%
6
80%
6
83%
6
60%
6
80%
6
80%
4
0%
4
67%
4
75%
4
100%
3
33%
3
0%
3
33%
3
67%
3
67%
2
50%
1
0%
1
0%
11
55%
9
56%
8
63%
Show all 22 rows
6
100%
6
0%
6
80%
6
83%
6
60%
6
80%
6
80%
4
0%
4
67%
4
75%
4
100%
3
33%
3
0%
3
33%
3
67%
3
67%
2
50%
1
0%
1
0%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
25/02114/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2026-05-19
24/02925/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2026-03-26
25/02114/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2026-05-19
24/02925/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2026-03-26
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 105 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Grainger Planning Associates Ltd
2. Harris Associates
3. Nema Designs
4. PRP Architects
At a glance
OfficerGeorgina Betts
BoroughCroydon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications105 (2021–26)
Approval rate61%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Croydon planning register and published decision notices, 2021–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Croydon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.