Development Intent
Planning AtlasCroydonSouth CroydonApplication
Planning Application

25/03792/FUL

29 Haling Park Road South Croydon CR2 6NJ

Full / Other PlanningSouth Croydon ward
Submission
25 Nov 2025
Target
12 Feb 2026
Decision
19 May 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
19 May 2026
Decided by Victoria Bates under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Erection of a two storey dwelling with associated landscaping, cycle parking and refuse storage

Why it was refused
Reason 1

It has not been demonstrated that the proposal would not add to existing parking stress due to demand from future residents for on street parking, resulting in harm to the highway network, contrary to Policies DM29 and DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and Policy T4 and T6.1 of the London Plan (2021).

Reason 2

The proposed refuse arrangements would result in bins being left on the street which would cause an obstruction and harm to the appearance of the streetscene contrary to policies DM10 and DM13 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018).

Reason 3

The proposal would result in harm to a protected tree due to incursion into Root Protection Areas of the building footprint, and services and utilities contrary to Policies DM28 of the Croydon Local Plan, G6 of the London Plan and Paragraph 131 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Reason 4

In the absence of a legal agreement, the development would not contribute to sustainable methods of transport or restrict the building method to self build. The proposal would fail to mitigate the harmful impacts of the development and would be unacceptable in planning terms. The proposal therefore conflicts with Policies T6 of the London Plan (2021) and Croydon Local Plan 2018 policies SP8, DM29 and DM30; and the Environment Act 2021. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way:

Reason 5

To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.

Policies cited
DM29
DM30
T4
T6.1
DM10
DM13
DM28
G6
National Planning Policy Framework 131
NPPF
T6
Parties
Applicant
Mr Stephen Harvey
Agent
RESI
Timeline
25 Nov 2025
Application submitted
18 Dec 2025
Application validated
19 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 18
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE19 May 2026View ↗
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL19 May 2026View ↗
SITE NOTICE NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION12 Jan 2026View ↗
AMENDMENT : APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA18 Dec 2025View ↗
AMENDMENT : HOW THE FEE WAS CALCULATED18 Dec 2025View ↗
AMENDMENT : A SUMMARY OF THE ATTACHMENTS IN THE PROPOSAL18 Dec 2025View ↗
LOCATION PLAN18 Dec 2025View ↗
AMENDMENT : SITE LOCATION GEOJSON18 Dec 2025View ↗
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT18 Dec 2025View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN OF THE SITE18 Dec 2025View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA25 Nov 2025View ↗
THE LOCATION PLAN25 Nov 2025View ↗
ALL PLANS25 Nov 2025View ↗
TREE SURVEY25 Nov 2025View ↗
BIODIVERSITY STATEMENT25 Nov 2025View ↗
FIRE STATEMENT25 Nov 2025View ↗
PLANNING STATEMENT25 Nov 2025View ↗
TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT25 Nov 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Croydon planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/03792/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Mr Stephen Harvey
Submitted
25 Nov 2025
Decision date
19 May 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
25
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 17 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2