Development Intent
Planning AtlasCroydonPurley And WoodcoteApplication
Planning Application

21/03680/FUL

32 Plough Lane Purley CR8 3QA

Full / Other PlanningPurley And Woodcote wardFlood Risk 100yr Surface Water: Area: 236
Submission
10 Jul 2021
Target
4 Sep 2021
Decision
10 Dec 2021
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
10 Dec 2021
Decided by Hayley Crabb under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Alterations, erection of 3 x three storey detached 4 bedroom houses to the rear of Larch Mead 32 Plough Lane with associated refuse and bike stores, formation of vehicular access and provision of associated parking

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposal, by reason of its height, scale, massing, design and choice of materials would result in a form of development that would appear out of character with the visual amenity of the street scene and character of the area contrary to Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Croydon Suburban Design Guide SPD (2019).

Reason 2

The development would provide poor level of accommodation with poor internal layout and poor outlook for future occupiers and would thereby conflict with Policies SP2.8 and DM10.4 and DM10.5 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018), Policies D.3 and D.6 of the London Plan (2021), the DCLG Technical Housing Standards - Nationally Described Space Standard (March 2015), the Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance to the London Plan (March 2016) and the Suburban Design Guide - Supplementary Planning Document (April 2019)

Reason 3

The development would result in the loss of a preserved tree protected by a Tree Preservation Order which contributes to the visual amenity of the street scene and the verdant character of the area. The development would thereby conflict with Policies D3 and G7 of the London Plan (2021) and policies DM10 and DM28 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018).

Reason 4

In-adequate car parking would be provided within the site to support the number of units proposed, it has also not been demonstrated that there would not be an unreasonable impact on highway safety and highway conditions in the surrounding roads, the longitudinal parking space and disabled space are sub-standard in size, in-sufficient turning space would be provided on site and lack of detail in respect of gradients across the site. The proposal would therefore conflict with Policies T4, T6 of the London Plan (2021), Policies SP8, DM29 and DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Suburban Design Guide (2019).

Reason 5

The proposed development would provide inadequate facilities for cycle parking within the site and would thereby conflict with Policies T4 and T5 of the London Plan (2021), Policies SP8, DM29 and DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance to the London Plan (March 2016).

Reason 6

The development would provide unsatisfactory facilities for refuse and bulky waste within the site and would thereby be contrary to Policies D6, Table 3.2 and SI7 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DM13 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Suburban Design Guide SPD (2019).

Reason 7

The development fails to demonstrate how it would ensure the safety of all buildings users in relation to fire, thereby conflicting with Policy D12 of the London Plan (2021) In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way:

Reason 8

To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process.

Policies cited
D3
D4
SP4
DM10
SP2.8
DM10.4
DM10.5
London Plan 6
G7
DM28
T4
T6
SP8
DM29
DM30
T5
London Plan 3.2
SI7
DM13
D12
Parties
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal
Timeline
10 Jul 2021
Application submitted
10 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 24
APPEAL DECISION22 Aug 2022View ↗
0986-01 STATEMENT OF CASE21 Dec 2021View ↗
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE10 Dec 2021View ↗
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL10 Dec 2021View ↗
186 115A11 Nov 2021View ↗
SITE LOCATION PLAN10 Jul 2021View ↗
BLOCK PLAN10 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING SITE PLAN10 Jul 2021View ↗
PROPOSED SITE PLAN10 Jul 2021View ↗
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN10 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE SECTION AA10 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE SECTION B10 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE SECTION C10 Jul 2021View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE SECTION D10 Jul 2021View ↗
SUPERSEDED - PROPOSED GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR PLANS10 Jul 2021View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS10 Jul 2021View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS10 Jul 2021View ↗
PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONS10 Jul 2021View ↗
PROPOSED BIN STORE AND BIKE SHELTER10 Jul 2021View ↗
DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT10 Jul 2021View ↗
BIODIVERSITY SURVEY AND REPORT10 Jul 2021View ↗
TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT10 Jul 2021View ↗
TREE SURVEY10 Jul 2021View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA10 Jul 2021View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Croydon planning register.
Summary
Reference
21/03680/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Mr Barry
Submitted
10 Jul 2021
Decision date
10 Dec 2021
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
22
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 14 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
12
In support
0
Total comments
13