Development Intent
Planning AtlasCroydonKenleyApplication
Planning Application

21/00946/FUL

67 Lower Road Kenley CR8 5NH

Full / Other PlanningKenley wardFlood Risk 100yr Surface Water: Area: 45840
Submission
25 Feb 2021
Target
23 Apr 2021
Decision
20 May 2021
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
20 May 2021
Decided by Jimill Patel under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Demolition of the existing two storey Light Industrial unit (Eg Use Class - previously B1c Use Class) and erection of a three-storey building comprising 2 self-contained flats (including change of use into C3 Use Class); hard and soft landscaping; boundary treatment; car parking; integrated refuse and cycle provision and private amenity space.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development, by reason of the combined height, width and depth and siting would result in substantial harm to the amenities of no.63, 69 Lower Road - Platinum Apartments and no.38, 40 Godstone Road by way of loss of outlook, sense of enclosure, visual intrusion, overbearing impact, loss of daylight/sunlight and overlooking and privacy. As such, the proposal would be contrary to Policies D1, D2 of the London Plan (2021), Policies SP4, DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) as well as the Croydon Suburban Design Guide (2019).

Reason 2

The proposed development would result in poor quality accommodation in regards to poor outlook/access to light for future occupiers, sub-standard and poorly sited cycle storage alongside refuse storage, failure to provide step free and accessible dwellings and lack of communal/play space. As such, the proposal would be contrary to Policies D4, D5, D6, D7 of the London Plan (2021), Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Croydon Suburban Design Guide (2019).

Reason 3

The proposed development, by reason of the combined height, width, depth and site layout alongside lack of critical character analysis and varying material pallet would result in a dominant, excessive, incongruous, visually intrusive and jarring and cramped form of overdevelopment that would be detrimental to the form, proportion and appearance of the site, relationship with the surrounding properties, character and appearance of the area and visual amenities of the streetscene. As such, the proposal would be contrary to Policies D1, D3, D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policies SP4, DM10, DM18 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Croydon Suburban Design Guide (2019).

Reason 4

The proposed development, by reason of the poor and convoluted/cramped parking layout which would require multiple manoeuvres, sub-standard and poorly sited cycle storage alongside refuse storage and lack of information regarding vehicle/pedestrian sightlines would result in a detrimental impact to the highway safety and pedestrian environment of the users of the area alongside future occupiers of the development. As such, the proposal would be contrary to Policies T1, T4, T5, T6,T7 of the London Plan (2021), Policies SP8, DM29, DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Croydon Suburban Design Guide (2019). In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. In this instance the pre application advice was not adhered to. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.

Policies cited
D1
D2
SP4
DM10
D4
D5
D6
D7
D3
DM18
T1
T4
T5
T6
T7
SP8
DM29
DM30
Parties
Applicant
Mr John Moya
Ward
Kenley
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal
Timeline
25 Feb 2021
Application submitted
26 Feb 2021
Application validated
20 May 2021
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 33
125 of 33
APPEAL DECISION9 Aug 2022View ↗
DOC 2 AERIAL 121 Sep 2021View ↗
DOC 3 AERIAL PHOTO 221 Sep 2021View ↗
DOC 12 PROPOSED PLANS (LANDSCAPING)-DEFAULT-002 (2)21 Sep 2021View ↗
PROPOSED PLANS (GROUND & 1ST FLOOR)-DEFAULT-00321 Sep 2021View ↗
STATEMENT OF CASE21 Sep 2021View ↗
DOC 7 LOWER ROAD STREET VIEW 121 Sep 2021View ↗
DOC 8 LOWER ROAD STREET VIEW 221 Sep 2021View ↗
DOC 9 LOWER ROAD STREET VIEW 321 Sep 2021View ↗
S 78 LOWER ROAD ADDENDUM21 Sep 2021View ↗
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE20 May 2021View ↗
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL20 May 2021View ↗
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT11 Mar 2021View ↗
PROPOSED SITE PLAN25 Feb 2021View ↗
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN25 Feb 2021View ↗
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN25 Feb 2021View ↗
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN25 Feb 2021View ↗
EXISTING ROOF PLAN25 Feb 2021View ↗
EXISTING SECTION25 Feb 2021View ↗
EXISTING SIDE ELEVATIONS25 Feb 2021View ↗
EXISTING FRONT AND REAR ELEVATION25 Feb 2021View ↗
PROPOSED LOFT AND ROOF PLAN25 Feb 2021View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR PLAN25 Feb 2021View ↗
PROPOSED SECTION AA AND SECTION BB25 Feb 2021View ↗
PROPOSED REAR AND SIDE ELEVATION25 Feb 2021View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Croydon planning register.
Summary
Reference
21/00946/FUL
Ward
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Mr John Moya
Submitted
25 Feb 2021
Decision date
20 May 2021
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
12
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 4 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
6
In support
0
Total comments
7