Development Intent
Planning AtlasCroydonBensham ManorApplication
Planning Application

20/06049/FUL

91 Beverstone Road Thornton Heath CR7 7LX

Full / Other PlanningBensham Manor wardFlood Risk 1000yr Surface Water: Area: 12
Submission
22 Nov 2020
Target
17 Jan 2021
Decision
3 Feb 2021
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
3 Feb 2021
Decided by Christopher Grace under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Proposal for a new self-built 2 bedroom dwellinghouse in the land adjacent to property n.91 with associated refuse and bike store

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposal by reason of its size, massing, position, design, appearance and choice of materials would result in an unsightly and obtrusive form of development which would appear overly wide in the streetscene out of keeping with the consistent row of terraces and would fail to integrate successfully within the immediate surroundings or respect or improve the existing pattern of buildings. The proposal would be detrimental in terms of its appearance in the streetscene. It would detract from the immediate surroundings and overall would result in an unacceptable development in townscape terms contrary to policies Policy 7.4 of the London Plan 2016 and Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018 and the Suburban Design Guide SPD 2019

Reason 2

The proposal would be detrimental to the visual amenity and outlook of the adjoining occupiers and surrounding neighbouring properties. The proposal would therefore be contrary to policies DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018.

Reason 3

The local authority is not satisfied that sufficient detail has been provided to ensure that the proposal would result in provision of suitable refuse storage facilities in terms of appearance for potential occupiers and therefore would be contrary to Policy DM13 and DM10 of The Croydon Local Plan 2018

Reason 4

The proposal would result in the loss of an existing off street parking space and fails to provide sufficient details to demonstrate adequate re-provision of on-street parking for both this loss and for the new additional unit, without leading to significant increase in on street parking pressure contrary to Policies SP8 and DM30 of The Croydon Local Plan (2018). In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application. The Local Planning Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.

Policies cited
London Plan 7.4
SP4
DM10
DM13
SP8
DM30
Parties
Applicant
Mr. Sisodia
Timeline
22 Nov 2020
Application submitted
3 Feb 2021
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 7
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE3 Feb 2021View ↗
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL3 Feb 2021View ↗
SITE LOCATION AND BLOCK PLAN22 Nov 2020View ↗
EXISTING PLANS, SECTION AND ELEVATIONS22 Nov 2020View ↗
PROPOSED PLANS, SECTION AND ELEVATIONS22 Nov 2020View ↗
DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT22 Nov 2020View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA22 Nov 2020View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Croydon planning register.
Summary
Reference
20/06049/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Mr. Sisodia
Submitted
22 Nov 2020
Decision date
3 Feb 2021
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0