Development Intent
Planning AtlasCroydonSelsdon Vale And ForestdaleApplication
Planning Application

20/05676/FUL

Rear Of 131 Benhurst Gardens South Croydon CR2 8NZ

Full / Other PlanningSelsdon Vale And Forestdale wardFlood Risk 100yr Surface Water: Area: 144
Submission
2 Nov 2020
Target
21 Jan 2021
Decision
22 Jan 2021
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
22 Jan 2021
Decided by Joe Sales under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Demolition of existing garage structure and the erection of a two-bedroom dwelling within the garden of 131 Benhurst Gardens. Replacement parking space to the front of the existing dwelling with new vehcular crossover.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

That development would not retain a sufficient amount of the existing grounds and garden area as a result of the proposed plot subdivision and does not provide a 10m retention distance across the width of the re- provided garden area. The proposal thereby conflicts with Policy DM10.4 (e) of the Croydon Local Plan.

Reason 2

The proposal, by reason of its generic design and architectural appearance and absence of character analysis, would result in a form of development that would appear out of character with the neighbouring properties and be detrimental to the general character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policies 7.4 and 7.6 of the London Plan (2016), Policies SP4 and DM10.7 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Croydon Suburban Design Guide (2019).

Reason 3

The siting of the proposed dwelling would result in undue harm to the residential amenities of the adjacent properties at No.129 and no.131 Benhurst Gardens through loss of outlook and amenity which is contrary to policies 7.4 and 7.6 of the London Plan (2016), policy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Suburban Design Guide (2019).

Reason 4

The proposed dropped kerb along Benhurst Gardens to serve the existing dwelling, due to its close proximity to the junction with Sundale Avenue would result in the compromise of highways safety and would not meet the aims and objectives of policies DM29 and DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018). In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. In this instance the pre application advice was not adhered to. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.

Policies cited
London Plan 7.4
London Plan 7.6
SP4
DM10.7
DM10
DM29
DM30
Parties
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal
Timeline
2 Nov 2020
Application submitted
26 Nov 2020
Application validated
22 Jan 2021
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 15
APPEAL DECISION15 Nov 2021View ↗
LPA STATEMENT OF CASE27 Aug 2021View ↗
STATEMENT-GROUNDS OF APPEAL30 Mar 2021View ↗
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE22 Jan 2021View ↗
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL22 Jan 2021View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED CROSS SECTION13 Nov 2020View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE SECTION13 Nov 2020View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED STREET SCENES13 Nov 2020View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS13 Nov 2020View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLAN13 Nov 2020View ↗
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT2 Nov 2020View ↗
COVERING LETTER2 Nov 2020View ↗
SITE LOCATION PLAN2 Nov 2020View ↗
EXISTING SITE PLAN2 Nov 2020View ↗
APPLICATION FORM2 Nov 2020View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Croydon planning register.
Summary
Reference
20/05676/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Mr P Mahi
Submitted
2 Nov 2020
Decision date
22 Jan 2021
Officer
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
12
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 4 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
4
In support
0
Total comments
4