Development Intent
AtlasConsultantsCharmian Baker Lb Hillingdon Civic Centre
Planning AtlasConsultantsCharmian Baker LB Hillingdon Civic Centre
Planning consultancy · London

Charmian Baker LB Hillingdon Civic Centre.

A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 100% of applicationsabove the London average of 81% — across 3 applications in 1 borough, 2021.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.

Planning consultancyActive 20211 boroughs100% approval10930th in London
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
3
Applications
London 2021
Appeal success
fewer than 5 appeals on record for this firm
Decision time
awaits decision-notice ingestion
Is this your firm?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
90%95%100%’21
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they submit — by scheme type
3decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]

The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data

How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this firm's applications concentrate, 2021.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
14009/APP/2021/2138
Planning Application
Approved
2021-07-22
14009/APP/2021/2139
Planning Application
Approved
2021-07-22
14009/APP/2021/2138
Planning Application
Approved
2021-07-22
14009/APP/2021/2139
Planning Application
Approved
2021-07-22
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 3 applications →
Developers they act for— subscriber data

No repeat company developers identified on this firm's applications.

At a glance
FirmCharmian Baker LB Hillingdon Civic Centre
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage1 London boroughs
Years active1 (2021)
Applications3
Approval rate100%
London avg81%
London rank10930th of 11,776
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
How every consultancy ranks →
Approval rate and scheme mix across London consultancies — the full track record.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 2021. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
  2. [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
  3. [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.