Development Intent
Planning AtlasCity Of LondonDE2
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
City Of London · Local Plan · Policy

DE2 — Design Quality.

How City Of London actually applies DE2: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DE2 is a published City Of London planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: City Of London Local Plan (adopted)

City Of London · DE2
Where DE2 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~2
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
10
times cited
in parsed decision notices
1 appeal
appeal survival
1 dismissed · 0 allowed at appeal — too few to rate
7 of 8
officer reach
88% of officers recorded in this period
Cheap
top hotspot ward
2 citations
What this policy is about

Policy DE2 requires a high quality of design in planning applications, applying to all developments in the City of London. The City Corporation will resist applications that compromise design quality due to cost cutting measures. It will support applications that demonstrate a high standard of design.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Design Quality

1. Development should be of an exemplar standard of design, aesthetics and architectural detail and should enhance the townscape and public realm. Development that would adversely affect the character, appearance or amenities of the buildings or area will be resisted. 2. The design of new development must ensure that: a. The layout, form, scale, massing and appearance of schemes are appropriate in relation to their surroundings and have due regard to the scale, height, building lines, character, historic interest and significance, urban grain and materials of the locality and relate well to the character of the area; b. The site layout takes account of established and potential pedestrian desire lines enhancing pedestrian permeability; c. Buildings and public spaces are inclusive and accessible for everyone; d. The architecture and urban design function well, are visually attractive with high quality detailing, finishes and materials, and enrich the overall quality of the area for the long term; e. Elevations have active, engaging and welcoming street frontages; f. The development incorporates high quality landscape design and maximises opportunities for greening, biodiversity and public realm improvements; City Plan 2040 | Shaping the Future City g. Innovative design approaches are used to create high quality buildings that meet high sustainability standards, and integrate well with the surroundings; h. It is constructed using appropriate, high quality, low carbon, sustainable and durable materials; i. It avoids unacceptable wind, loss of daylight and sunlight and thermal comfort impacts at street level or intrusive solar glare impacts on the surrounding townscape and public realm; j. The proposed uses and activities are accommodated within the curtilage of the development and do not rely on use of the public realm, including the use of public highway; k. The plant and building services equipment are fully screened from view and integrated into the design of the building such that there are no adverse impacts on amenity in surrounding areas; l. The form, profile and appearance of the roofscape adds visual interest and complements the building. 3. Applicants will be encouraged to undertake meaningful developer-led engagement before submitting their planning application in line with the City Corporation’s Developer Engagement Guidance; 4. Applicants will be required to provide digital 3D visualisations of their developments in an open source or other format compatible with the City Corporation’s 3D digital modelling technology. These visualisations should be used to inform pre-application and post application consultation with local communities and stakeholders. Design 5. Applicants will be required to ensure the quality of the approved development is not materially diminished between permission and completion as a result of changes to the permitted to scheme. City Plan 2040 | Shaping the Future City Reason for the policy 9.3.0 Buildings and spaces around buildings affect us all – they are where we live, work and spend our leisure time; they shape our experiences as we spend time in them and move around them. Therefore central to delivering the right kind of growth, it is important to ensure that buildings are of high quality design; 9.3.1 Given the exceptional quality of the City’s built environment, it’s essential for new developments to capture and enhance the qualities and characteristics that make it a special place; The network of routes and spaces, the scale, form, architectural expression and detailed design of buildings, together with the use of particular building materials, and the contribution of these elements to the composition of street blocks are all characteristic of, and combine to produce, the close-knit and intricate townscape of the City. It is important that new buildings and alterations respect and reinforce this general character. The City has dynamic, striking and internationally acclaimed architecture as well as more contextual buildings appropriate to their townscape setting. How the policy works 9.3.2 This policy expects applicants to approach the design of new buildings, extensions or modifications to existing buildings in an interesting, innovative and appropriate manner. Whilst no particular architectural style is encouraged, the expectation is that every scheme should be of the highest quality meeting the requirements set out in this policy and should be based Design on a sound understanding of the site and its context. A series of key characteristic features have been identified in the City’s Character Areas Study, which should be applied to understand the underlying character of the different areas of the City. In assessing development proposals, careful consideration will be given to the scale, form, massing, appearance and those distinctive features that contribute to the area’s unique identity and local character. 9.3.3 Good design is a key aspect for creating places, buildings or spaces that work well for everyone, look good, last long and can adapt to the changing needs of future generations. Making the right choices at all levels of the design process is therefore very important. The development proposals will be required to clearly articulate the design evolution from the conceptual stage to the final product. This narrative should be set out in the Design and Access Statement and should address the key design aspects outlined in the National Design Guidance: X the layout X the form X the scale of buildings X their appearance X landscape X materials X their detailing City Plan 2040 | Shaping the Future City 9.3.4 Wind conditions and solar glare may have an adverse effect on the surrounding townscape and the quality and use of the public realm. Assessments will need to be carried out on the impact of proposed development on wind conditions, thermal comfort and solar glare. Any adverse impacts should be minimised and unavoidable impacts will need to be mitigated. Appropriate measures to achieve this should be integrated into the design of the development. The City Corporation has published guidelines for developers on wind microclimate studies required to support planning applications. Further guidance is available on solar glare, solar convergence and daylight and sunlight impacts of development. 9.3.5 The design and implementation of building extensions and alterations, such as entrances and windows, are important because they have a cumulative effect on the overall character and appearance of the City. Extensions or alterations should be considered in relation to the architectural character of the building, designed to minimise their impact and integrated into the design of the building. Alterations and extensions should achieve a successful design relationship with their surroundings, taking full account of the local context and the setting of the building. 9.3.6 In most buildings, the ground floor elevation has the most effect on public amenity, so its design should be given particular attention to ensure that it is legible, visually attractive and provides active frontages. Blank frontages and ventilation louvres should be avoided. Ventilation louvres, where necessary, should be located away from busy streets. Design 9.3.7 Plant should be located below ground. Where this is not feasible, it should be satisfactorily integrated into the form and design of the roof. It should be enclosed and covered where it would otherwise harm the appearance of the building, the general scene, or views from other buildings. Intake points should be located away from existing and potential pollution sources (e.g. busy roads and combustion flues). All combustion flues should terminate above the roof height of the tallest building in the development to ensure maximum dispersion of pollutants. 9.3.8 Servicing entrances can have a detrimental impact on the appearance of the building and its immediate setting and can harm otherwise attractive pedestrian routes. The City Corporation expects innovative design solutions for servicing entrances and adjacent areas to minimise their visual impact and to enable them to be integrated into the design of the building. Design solutions must respect the sensitive nature of listed buildings and conservation areas. 9.3.9 Ventilation or extraction systems should be routed internally, and extensive or unsightly external ducting will not normally be permitted. Provision must be made within the building for services and ducting to and from all uses. Ventilation systems in new build premises for extracting and dispersing any emissions and cooking smells must be discharged at roof level and designed, installed, operated and maintained in accordance with manufacturer’s specification in order to prevent smells and emissions adversely affecting neighbours. For changes of use, developers and/or occupiers should investigate the potential City Plan 2040 | Shaping the Future City to vent emissions to the roof. Developers should provide suitable rooftop ventilation, where appropriate. Where it can be demonstrated that venting of such emissions to the roof is not practical, venting to an adjacent footway will only be acceptable where the extraction system is of the highest specification for odour abatement and there is no adverse impact on neighbours by virtue of smells or other emissions. Other ventilation louvres should not be sited by adjoining footways.

Verbatim from the adopted City Of London plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
90% in approvals · 0% in refusals
10 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Cheap2
Bishopsgate2
Langbourn1
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DE2 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DE2 appears most often in Cheap, Bishopsgate, Langbourn. It appears across 7 of 8 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
90%
in approvals
9 citations
0%
in refusals
0 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DE2 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DE2 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
survival
1 dismissed · 0 allowed1 PINS appeal decisions cite DE2

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DE2. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. Too few decisive appeals for a rate — the counts are the record. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DE2 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
City Of London
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
City Of London's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published City Of London decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.