Development Intent
AtlasCamdenPolicyCC5
Planning AtlasCamdenCC5
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Camden · Local Plan · Policy

CC5 — Waste.

How Camden actually applies CC5: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

CC5 is a published Camden planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Camden Local Plan (adopted)

Camden · CC5
Where CC5 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~1
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
5
times cited
in parsed decision notices
1 appeal
appeal survival
1 dismissed · 0 allowed at appeal — too few to rate
5 of 57
officer reach
9% of officers recorded in this period
Highgate
top hotspot ward
1 citations
What this policy is about

Policy CC5 requires developments in Camden to include waste and recycling facilities. The council will resist closing Camden's existing waste site at Regis Road unless a suitable replacement is provided. It aims to reduce waste and increase recycling to meet London Plan targets.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Waste

The Council will seek to make Camden a low waste borough. We will: a. aim to reduce the amount of waste produced in the borough and increase recycling and the reuse of materials to meet the London Plan targets of 50% of household waste recycled/composted by 2020 and aspiring to achieve 60% by 2031; b. deal with North London’s waste by working with our partner boroughs in North London to produce a Waste Plan, which will ensure that sufficient land is allocated to manage the amount of waste apportioned to the area in the London Plan; c. safeguard Camden’s existing waste site at Regis Road unless a suitable compensatory waste site is provided that replaces the maximum throughput achievable at the existing site; and d. make sure that developments include facilities for the storage and collection of waste and recycling.

Verbatim from the adopted Camden plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
100% in approvals · 0% in refusals
5 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Highgate1
Belsize1
Holborn & Covent Garden1
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue CC5 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

CC5 appears most often in Highgate, Belsize, Holborn & Covent Garden. It appears across 5 of 57 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
100%
in approvals
5 citations
0%
in refusals
0 citations

This shows the decision reports in which CC5 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why CC5 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
survival
1 dismissed · 0 allowed1 PINS appeal decisions cite CC5

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite CC5. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. Too few decisive appeals for a rate — the counts are the record. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing CC5 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Camden
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Camden's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Camden decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.