Development Intent
Planning AtlasBromley6
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Bromley · Local Plan · Policy

6 — Residential Extensions.

How Bromley actually applies 6: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

6 is a published Bromley planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Bromley Local Plan (adopted)

Bromley · 6
Where 6 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~53
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
343
times cited
in parsed decision notices
appeal survival
no PINS appeal decisions cite it
0 of 2
officer reach
0% of officers recorded in this period
Petts Wood & Knoll
top hotspot ward
53 citations
What this policy is about

Policy 6 requires residential extension proposals to respect the scale, form, and materials of the host dwelling and the surrounding area, maintain space between buildings, and use dormer windows appropriately.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Residential Extensions

The design and layout of proposals for the alteration or enlargement of residential properties will be required to satisfy all of the following criteria: a - the scale, form and materials of construction should respect or complement those of the host dwelling and be compatible with development in the surrounding area; b - space or gaps between buildings should be respected or maintained where these contribute to the character of the area; c - dormer windows should be of a size and design appropriate to the roofscape and sited away from prominent roof pitches, unless dormers are a feature of the area.

Verbatim from the adopted Bromley plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
82% in approvals · 18% in refusals
343 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Petts Wood & Knoll53
Farnborough & Crofton28
Chislehurst28
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue 6 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

6 appears most often in Petts Wood & Knoll, Farnborough & Crofton, Chislehurst. It appears across 0 of 2 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer

Needs each citation joined to the case officer who wrote it — arrives with officer-report parsing for Bromley.

Why it is cited — and what follows
82%
in approvals
280 citations
18%
in refusals
62 citations

This shows the decision reports in which 6 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why 6 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance

No Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions on record cite 6. When one lands (the appeals table refreshes each weekday), the dismissed/allowed record appears here — never estimated.

Related — follow the thread
Bromley
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Bromley's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Bromley decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.