Development Intent
AtlasBromleyPolicy117
Planning AtlasBromley117
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Bromley · Local Plan · Policy

117 — Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Capacity.

How Bromley actually applies 117: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

117 is a published Bromley planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Bromley Local Plan (adopted)

Bromley · 117
Where 117 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~14
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
115
times cited
in parsed decision notices
appeal survival
no PINS appeal decisions cite it
1 of 2
officer reach
50% of officers recorded in this period
Chislehurst
top hotspot ward
14 citations
What this policy is about

Policy 117 restricts planning permission for developments that increase water and wastewater demand unless sufficient capacity exists or can be provided in time. This applies to all developments. The council will resist granting permission if infrastructure improvements are not programmed or cannot be completed before occupation.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Capacity

Planning permission will only be granted for developments which increase the demand for off-site water and wastewater infrastructure where: Sufficient capacity already exists; or Extra capacity can be provided in time to serve the development that will ensure that the environment and the amenities of other users are not adversely affected. In accordance with planning practice guidance, when there is a capacity constraint and improvements in off-site infrastructure are not programmed, planning permission will only be granted where the appropriate infrastructure improvements that will be completed prior to occupation of the development.

Verbatim from the adopted Bromley plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
97% in approvals · 1% in refusals
115 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Chislehurst14
Orpington8
Darwin8
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue 117 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

117 appears most often in Chislehurst, Orpington, Darwin. It appears across 1 of 2 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
97%
in approvals
112 citations
1%
in refusals
1 citations

This shows the decision reports in which 117 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 2 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why 117 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance

No Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions on record cite 117. When one lands (the appeals table refreshes each weekday), the dismissed/allowed record appears here — never estimated.

Related — follow the thread
Bromley
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Bromley's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Bromley decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.