Development Intent
AtlasBromleyPolicy116
Planning AtlasBromley116
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Bromley · Local Plan · Policy

116 — Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS).

How Bromley actually applies 116: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

116 is a published Bromley planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Bromley Local Plan (adopted)

Bromley · 116
Where 116 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~14
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
124
times cited
in parsed decision notices
appeal survival
no PINS appeal decisions cite it
1 of 2
officer reach
50% of officers recorded in this period
Chislehurst
top hotspot ward
14 citations
What this policy is about

Policy 116 requires developments to incorporate Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) or alternative sustainable approaches to surface water management. This applies to developments in Flood Zones 2, 3a, 3b, and certain areas in Flood Zone 1. Applications must be accompanied by a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) for these areas.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS)

All developments should seek to incorporate Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) or demonstrate alternative sustainable approaches to the management of surface water as far as possible. Applications for developments located within Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b and in Flood Zone 1 for areas identified as hot spots in Bromley’s Surface water Management Plan (SWAMP), Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (PFRA) and in the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment must be accompanied by a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA).

Verbatim from the adopted Bromley plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
97% in approvals · 2% in refusals
124 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Chislehurst14
Orpington9
Farnborough & Crofton8
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue 116 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

116 appears most often in Chislehurst, Orpington, Farnborough & Crofton. It appears across 1 of 2 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
97%
in approvals
120 citations
2%
in refusals
2 citations

This shows the decision reports in which 116 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 2 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why 116 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance

No Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions on record cite 116. When one lands (the appeals table refreshes each weekday), the dismissed/allowed record appears here — never estimated.

Related — follow the thread
Bromley
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Bromley's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Bromley decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.