Development Intent
AtlasBrentPolicyDMP1
Planning AtlasBrentDMP1
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Brent · Local Plan · Policy

DMP1 — DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT GENERAL.

How Brent actually applies DMP1: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DMP1 is a published Brent planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Brent Local Plan (adopted)

Brent · DMP1
Where DMP1 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~4
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
32
times cited
in parsed decision notices
73%
appeal survival
236 dismissed · 88 allowed at appeal
14 of 26
officer reach
54% of officers recorded in this period
Queens Park
top hotspot ward
4 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DMP1 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DMP1 appears most often in Queens Park, Wembley Hill, Fryent - WARD NO LONGER EXISTS. It appears across 14 of 26 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
97%
in approvals
31 citations
3%
in refusals
1 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DMP1 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DMP1 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
73% survival
236 dismissed · 88 allowed · 1 split325 PINS appeal decisions cite DMP1

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DMP1. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DMP1 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Brent
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Brent's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Brent decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.