Development Intent
Planning AtlasBrentAlpertonApplication
Planning Application

22/0274

Priory House, Marsh Road, Wembley, HA0 1ES

Full / Other PlanningAlperton wardNot Available: Strategic Ind Locations/Local Ind Sites
Submission
26 Jan 2022
Target
2 May 2022
Decision
29 Apr 2022
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
29 Apr 2022
Decided by Liam McFadden under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Demolition of two storey building (priory house) and erection of a 4 storey building comprising offices/general industry/storage or distribution (Use Class E(g)(i)/B2/B8), provision of car and cycle parking and refuse storage

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The submitted information lack sufficient detail on the proposed uses to be implemented on site. As such, it has failed to demonstrate that the proposal would be compatible with the use of the site, which is protected solely for industrial uses as set out within policy E4 of London Plan 2021. It would therefore be contrary to Policies E4 of The London Plan 2021 and BE2 of Brent’s Local Plan 2019-2041.

Reason 2

The proposed fenestration would introduce and unwanted and incongruous design to a prominent corner location. This would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the area and would be contrary to Policies DMP1 and BD1 of Brent’s Local Plan 2019-2041

Reason 3

The proposal has failed to provide a Fire Statement produced by a third party, suitably qualified assessor, setting out how the development proposal would function in terms of the criteria set out within policy D12b of London Plan 2021.

Reason 4

The submitted plans do not demonstrate the existing Urban Greening Factor (UGF) or what steps have been taken to contribute to the Urban Greening of the site. This would be contrary to Policy G5 of The London Plan 2021.

Reason 5

Due to the lack of car parking for unit 4 and position of its loading bay next to unit 5, together with the lack of a loading bay for unit 6, lack of tracking diagrams relation to the loading bays for units 4, 5 and 6, and the absence of a Car Parking and Servicing Management Plan, it has not been demonstrated that the development would be suitably and safely accessed in terms of accessed by service vehicles. This would be contrary to policies DMP1, BT2 and BT3 of Brent’s Local Plan 2019-2041. Furthermore, in the absence of a legal agreement to secure a contribution, the scheme has failed to contribute towards funding to implementing pedestrian and cyclist access improvements in the vicinity of the site. This would be contrary to policy DMP1 and BT1 of Brent's Local Plan 2019-2041.

Reason 6

The submitted Energy Strategy fails to show compliance with the four stages of the energy hierarchy and as such has failed to demonstrate that the maximum reduction in energy demand has been achieved. This would be contrary to Policy SI2 of The London Plan 2021. Furthermore, in the absence of a legal agreement, any identified shortfall in zero carbon setting, has not been secured through an payment in lieu, as set out within policy SI2 of London Plan 2021.

Reason 7

The proposal has failed to submit a drainage strategy in accordance with the drainage hierarchy as set out within policy SI13 of London Plan 2021. As such it has failed to demonstrate that the proposal would achieve greenfield runoff rates for surface water, or where greenfield run-off rates cannot be achieved that this has been clearly justified. Furthermore, insufficient information has been provided in relation to the design and layout of the proposal in relation to drainage measures as required by policy BSUI4 of Brent's Local Plan 2019-2041. .

Reason 8

The air quality assessment has failed to consider the transport emissions of the proposal and therefore failed to demonstrate that it would be air quality neutral as required by policy SI1 of London Plan 2021 and policy BSUI2 of Brent's Local Plan 2019-2041.

Policies cited
E4
BE2
DMP1
BD1
D12b
G5
BT2
BT3
BT1
SI2
SI13
BSUI4
SI1
BSUI2
Parties
Timeline
26 Jan 2022
Application submitted
31 Jan 2022
Application validated
29 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 30
125 of 30
Existing location plan105559370000.pdf29 Apr 2022View ↗
Existing site plan105559370000.pdf29 Apr 2022View ↗
Existing first floor plan105559370000.pdf29 Apr 2022View ↗
Existing ground floor plan105559370000.pdf29 Apr 2022View ↗
Existing roof plan105559370000.pdf29 Apr 2022View ↗
Proposed roof plan105559370000.pdf29 Apr 2022View ↗
Existing and proposed rear elevations29 Apr 2022View ↗
Proposed ground floor plan29 Apr 2022View ↗
Proposed other floor plans29 Apr 2022View ↗
Existing and proposed front elevations29 Apr 2022View ↗
Existing and proposed side elevations29 Apr 2022View ↗
Final delegated report29 Apr 2022View ↗
Final decision notice29 Apr 2022View ↗
Eh comments21 Mar 2022View ↗
Policy comments11 Mar 2022View ↗
Eh noise2 Mar 2022View ↗
Transport comments22 Feb 2022View ↗
Air quality assessment1 Feb 2022View ↗
Revised design and access statement1 Feb 2022View ↗
Planning statement1 Feb 2022View ↗
3d rendered images may 202127 Jan 2022View ↗
Existing site pictures27 Jan 2022View ↗
Energy assessment27 Jan 2022View ↗
Floor risk map27 Jan 2022View ↗
Cil form27 Jan 2022View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Brent planning register.
Summary
Reference
22/0274
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Mr B Nagi
Submitted
26 Jan 2022
Decision date
29 Apr 2022
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
13
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 5 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0