Development Intent
AtlasBexleyWardsErith
Planning Atlas›Bexley›ERITH
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Ward · London Borough of Bexley

ERITH.

ERITH sees an approval rate of 79% — 4 points below the Bexley average across 352 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 20.9% — the highest in the borough.[1]

Bexley352 applicationsHighest refusalSave
ERITH · Bexley
Loading map…
352
Applications 2020–26
Decided applications
79%
Approval rate
4pp below borough avg (83%)
20.9%
Refusal rate
Highest in Bexley
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Bexley planning records and committee minutes, 2020–26.
Ward overview

ERITH recorded 352 substantive planning decisions over 2020–26, approving 79% of them — 4 percentage points below the Bexley borough average of 83%. Its refusal rate of 20.9% is highest in bexley.

Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Reference
Address
Type
Outcome
Date
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%

Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.

At a glance[1]
WardERITH
CouncilBexley
Applications352 (2020–26)
Approval rate79%
Refusal rate20.9%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
  1. [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Bexley planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
  3. [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
  4. [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.