Development Intent
AtlasBexleyCouncillorsRags_sandhu
Planning AtlasBexleyRags Sandhu
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Bexleyheath, Bexley

Rags Sandhu.

A Conservative member representing Bexleyheath in Bexley. 1% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Bexleyheath itself.

ConservativeBexleyheath ward
Bexley · Rags Sandhu's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
150
Interventions
at committee
86
Meetings
attended
1%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
14
Ward objection
6
Ward support
1

How Rags Sandhu acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Rags Sandhu moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Show all 7 rows
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
Planning Committee
2025-07-31
At a glance
PartyConservative
WardBexleyheath
Planning committeeNo
CouncilBexley
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Bexley planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 141 of their 150 interventions (94%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.