Development Intent
AtlasBarnetPolicyDM01
Planning AtlasBarnetDM01
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Barnet · Local Plan · Policy

DM01 — Protecting Barnet’s character and amenity Page.

How Barnet actually applies DM01: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM01 is a published Barnet planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Barnet Local Plan (adopted)

Barnet · DM01
Where DM01 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~298
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
4,078
times cited
in parsed decision notices
72%
appeal survival
355 dismissed · 135 allowed at appeal
77 of 83
officer reach
93% of officers recorded in this period
Mill Hill
top hotspot ward
298 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM01 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM01 appears most often in Mill Hill, Hendon, Childs Hill. It appears across 77 of 83 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
84%
in approvals
3,434 citations
16%
in refusals
643 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM01 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM01 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
72% survival
355 dismissed · 135 allowed · 3 split493 PINS appeal decisions cite DM01

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM01. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM01 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Barnet
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Barnet's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Barnet decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.