Development Intent
AtlasBarnetOfficersSam Gerstein
Case officer · Barnet Planning

Sam Gerstein.

Active — last recorded decision Apr 2026

A case officer at Barnet with an approval rate of 95% across 21 decided planning applications, spanning 5 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer21 decisions95% approvalSave
Barnet · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
21
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%100%2020100%2021100%2022100%2023100%20240%2025100%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate95% · 3rd of 85
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Sam Gerstein's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Sam Gerstein decided — 1 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

ECC05Barnet plan
1 times cited
GG3London Plan
1 times cited
G4London Plan
1 times cited
98NPPF
1 times cited
G2London Plan
1 times cited
ECC06Biodiversity retention and enhancement in developmentBarnet plan
1 times cited
187NPPF
1 times cited
G6London Plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
Show all 5 rows

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
24/2584/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2026-04-01
24/5650/OUT
Outline Application
Refused
2025-07-24
24/2584/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2026-04-01
24/5650/OUT
Outline Application
Refused
2025-07-24
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 21 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Related Argent
2. CarneySweeney Planning
3. DWD
4. Carney Sweeney
At a glance
OfficerSam Gerstein
BoroughBarnet
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications21 (2020–26)
Approval rate95%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Barnet planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Barnet decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.