Development Intent
AtlasBarnetOfficersJacinta Naicker
Planning Atlas›Barnet›Jacinta Naicker
Case officer · Barnet Planning

Jacinta Naicker.

Last recorded decision Mar 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Barnet with an approval rate of 86% across 76 decided planning applications, spanning 11 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer76 decisions86% approvalSave
Barnet · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
76
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%83%202089%2021100%2022
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate86% · 26th of 85
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Jacinta Naicker's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Jacinta Naicker decided — 15 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

CS1 arnet’s place shaping strategy – protection,Barnet plan
15 times cited
DM01Protecting Barnet’s character and amenity PageBarnet plan
15 times cited
NPPFNPPF
15 times cited
1.1Superseded
3 times cited
7.4Superseded
3 times cited
7.5Superseded
3 times cited
7.6Superseded
3 times cited
DM04Environmental Considerations forBarnet plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
16
79%
12
83%
12
80%
11
90%
11
91%
6
100%
3
100%
2
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%
16
79%
12
83%
12
80%
Show all 11 rows
11
90%
11
91%
6
100%
3
100%
2
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–21.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
20/3129/RCU
Retention/Continued Use
Approved
2022-02-07
21/1441/HSE
Householder Application
Approved
2021-10-21
20/3129/RCU
Retention/Continued Use
Approved
2022-02-07
21/1441/HSE
Householder Application
Approved
2021-10-21
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 76 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Alan Cox Associates
2. JLArchitecture
3. New Images Architects
4. Barkay Builders
At a glance
OfficerJacinta Naicker
BoroughBarnet
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications76 (2020–21)
Approval rate86%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Barnet planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Barnet decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.