Development Intent
AtlasBarnetOfficersDeniss Nikandrovs
Case officer · Barnet Planning

Deniss Nikandrovs.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Barnet with an approval rate of 54% across 115 decided planning applications, spanning 26 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer115 decisions54% approvalSave
Barnet · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
115
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%69%2020100%202150%202542%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate54% · 83rd of 85
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Deniss Nikandrovs's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Deniss Nikandrovs decided — 16 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DM01Protecting Barnet’s character and amenity PageBarnet plan
9 times cited
CDH01Promoting High Quality DesignBarnet plan
8 times cited
CS1 arnet’s place shaping strategy – protection,Barnet plan
7 times cited
NPPFNPPF
7 times cited
TRC03Electric vehicle charging points in new developmentBarnet plan
6 times cited
ECC02Green Belt and Metropolitan Open LandBarnet plan
5 times cited
D14London Plan
5 times cited
CDH05Extensions to buildings must follow good design principlesBarnet plan
4 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
26/0897/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2026-06-08
26/1992/FUL
Full Application
2026-05-28
26/0897/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2026-06-08
26/1992/FUL
Full Application
2026-05-28
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 115 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. EA Town Planning Ltd
2. MSK Design Ltd
3. Great Plans
4. Henry Planning Ltd
At a glance
OfficerDeniss Nikandrovs
BoroughBarnet
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications115 (2020–26)
Approval rate54%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Barnet planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Barnet decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.