Development Intent
AtlasBarnetCouncillorsAlan_schneiderman
Planning AtlasBarnetAlan Schneiderman
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Cricklewood, Barnet

Alan Schneiderman.

A Labour member representing Cricklewood in Barnet. 50% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Cricklewood itself.

LabourCricklewood ward
Barnet · Alan Schneiderman's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
6
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
50%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
3
Raised concern
2
Ward support
1

How Alan Schneiderman acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Alan Schneiderman moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Strategic Planning Committee
2022-01-12
Raised concern
Strategic Planning Committee
2021-09-09
Ward support
Strategic Planning Committee
2021-09-09
Strategic Planning Committee
2021-09-09
Strategic Planning Committee
2023-10-04
Strategic Planning Committee
2022-01-12
Ward objection
Strategic Planning Committee
2022-01-12
Raised concern
Strategic Planning Committee
2021-09-09
Ward support
Strategic Planning Committee
2021-09-09
Show all 6 rows
Strategic Planning Committee
2021-09-09
Strategic Planning Committee
2023-10-04
Strategic Planning Committee
2022-01-12
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardCricklewood
Planning committeeNo
CouncilBarnet
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Barnet planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 6 of their 6 interventions (100%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.